Still Andrew (I guess) is a user on You can follow them or interact with them if you have an account anywhere in the fediverse.

Chromium and Firefox both consume obscene amounts of memory just to do basic things, more or less equally. However that changes when you're working locally using many applications, compilers, several terminals, code editors, and many documentation tabs open in the browser (can't close all docs I need whilst coding)
I've stress tested the machines I use for work and forced the memory available down to a lower limit to see how these two browsers behave under different conditions. Chromium / Chrome doesn't relinquish RAM as efficiently as Firefox does. Firefox uses inordinate amounts of RAM, but it knows better when to free it, and I'm able to use even limited memory configurations under stress tests with many tabs open. Chromium / Chrome just freezes randomly if you have 8 or 10 tabs open whilst doing equivalent work, sometimes to the point of halting the whole system.
For heavy duty work, Firefox just works better.

Still Andrew (I guess) @ajroach42

@h But if the docs don't work in lynx or dillo, then the docs are bad, yeah?

· Web · 1 · 2

@ajroach42 I agree. The practice of requiring Javascript in order to view docs numbs my mind. (Try to find a PDF or plain HTML docs of the Mongodb database or the Quasar Framework docs. Javascript may not be the ultimate pest, but the practices of too many Javascript people who aren't very good engineers are littering the web. Millions of them)